For some time I have been trying to find the right frame of
reference to understand the appeal of Donald Trump as a presidential candidate.
It isn’t hard to grasp why so many voters find an “outsider” appealing – lots
of working class Democrats and Republicans feel like their party establishments
have taken them for granted. With regard to some of the issues that Trump
features in his campaign - illegal immigration, harmful trade deals, reckless
intervention in the Middle East – there is no real difference between the
Democratic and Republican establishments, despite the feelings of many (most?)
rank and file voters.
So there is no lack of reasons for voters to be angry and to
look for someone who is not perceived as in insider. Many voters on the left
and right feel unrepresented and exploited by the moneyed interests that control
both parties. This explains the incredible popularity of Bernie Sanders, Ben
Carson, Donald Trump, and to a lesser extent, Ted Cruz. 2016 is a great year for
an insurgency candidacy.
But out of all of these options, why has Donald Trump been
able to galvanize so much support? The recurring refrain I hear is that he
“tells it like it is” – “he means what he says.” And yet this is the one thing
that is demonstrably FALSE about Donald Trump. He does not tell it like it is,
and he does not mean what he says. And this has been pointed out over,
and over, and over again. Just the other night I almost fell off of the couch when Trump said that
the IRS might be auditing him because he was such a strong Christian. This despite
the fact that he has claimed never to ask for forgiveness,
even though he has done many things that by ANY definition of Christianity
would merit the need for forgiveness (like serial adultery, for starters).
How then to explain the Donald Trump phenomenon? How can
someone whose personal character is so deplorable, whose political positions
are so malleable, and whose public persona is so juvenile, be winning state
after state in the GOP primaries?
And then it hit me – the answer is professional wrestling.
I am a long-time fan of pro wrestling. I still have the
championship belt I made as a child as part of the wrestling fun we would have
in my neighborhood growing up. Every month I would go to Rupp Arena to see
Jerry “the King” Lawler take on the newest bad guy (“heel” in wrestling lingo)
brought in by dastardly manager Jimmy Hart. I still love to watch videos of the
old school stuff.
Some of you are sneering at the very mention of “rasslin”
and feel it necessary to point out that it’s “fake”. Well, duh! It is
entertainment, like a play or a movie. And no one walks out of a movie saying,
“It’s fake.” Pro wrestling, at its finest, gave just enough reality to allow
its fans to suspend disbelief and enjoy the matches as if they were legitimate
athletic contests. And the enjoyment came in the visceral “good guy vs bad guy”
drama presented in the ring. Of course, back in the day there were always a few
people who didn’t see through the illusion, and actually thought the show was
completely legit (these fans were called “marks” by the wrestlers). But most of
us knew what we were watching, permitted the suspension of disbelief, and
enjoyed the show for what it was.
For many years Donald Trump has excelled at a performance
art that claims to be “real” but is in fact highly choreographed - “reality television.” And before that, The
Donald was heavily involved in professional wrestling. Trump Plaza in Atlantic
City hosted two Wrestlemanias, and in 2007 he appeared in WrestleMania 23 in a
match against Vince McMahon dubbed the “Battle of the Billionaires.” Trump’s
connections with the WWE are so strong that in 2013 he was inducted into the
celebrity wing of the WWE Hall of Fame.
And just like any good wrestler, Donald Trump has managed to
perform in such a way as to get over with the fans (the electorate). Despite his painfully
obvious lack of substance,
some voters have even become marks for him (and I would guess it is roughly the
same group of people that think rasslin is real and Obama isn’t an American).
But I don’t think most people supporting Trump are marks. They
are just so fed up with the status quo in Washington that they are willing to
suspend disbelief about Trump’s character failings, about his deeply
un-American authoritarianism,
about his demagoguery on the issues, and support him out of the visceral
satisfaction that this somehow sticks it to the real bad guys.
I get that. I feel frustrated with the establishment as
well. I have little respect for the parties and their unwillingness to tackle
the entitlement crisis, their cowardly failure to stand up to the Israelis and
Saudis in our Middle Eastern policy, and their failure to work together against
the extremists on the right and the left. But Donald Trump is not the right
person to carry the banner for reform and renewal. His track record offers
absolutely no reason to believe that what he says today is what he will do
tomorrow. He is not the voice of the anti-establishment. For decades he has
been the establishment.
One of the great heels in wrestling was a character called “The Million Dollar Man” (Ted DiBiase). His gimmick was that he was incredibly wealthy, and could buy whatever he wanted – even the championship. Each week he would come out on TV and select a fan to do some sort of demeaning task for a sum of money, always with the slogan, “Everyone has a price for the Million Dollar Man.”
Donald Trump is proud of his billions, and apparently, there are lots of people
who do have a price. They have decided to sacrifice civility, thoughtfulness,
and prudence to vote for the Billion Dollar Man. As angry as I am, and as frustrated as I am, this is a price I cannot pay.
Great analogy, I went to Nashville to see those matches that's the only difference.
ReplyDeleteWell, I have checked each day and here it is. Somehow I knew from the very beginning that you would be very negative toward Trump. First, I have not decided on my candidate but I have narrowed it to two that I can vote for as a registered Republican. I won't bother mentioning the other candidate as he wasn't attacked in your article.
ReplyDelete1. Trump is a successful businessman and even you can't dispute that. One thing about it, dollars do not lie. So, expanding that, he sees trade deficits with other countries and recognizes that we are not getting to play on a level business field. And he says he knows how to fix that and he can.
2. What he said about Muslims was that he would apply a TEMPORARY ban on all Muslins until we can get our visas, or any entry process updated. Please, he said temporary.
3. What he said about our southern boarder is that we need to get control of it. He said that he would build a wall. I find it ironic that our society is so great that we have to build a wall to keep folks out. And to keep folks safe. Enforce the law and abide by our quotas. Be fair, be equal, but enforce the law or change them.
4. I find it offensive that you would accuse me as a 'mark' because I have taken the candidates through my filters or biases (just like you) and come to a different opinion about my two candidates.
5. Galvanizing support? Are those who disagree.... or choose to support some one else....are they sub-par in intelligence? 'Fake', 'duh'...really?
6. 'Serial Adultery'? Where did that come from?
And yes, like you, I am angry. I am angry at Washington and long for it to be cleaned. I am angry at Washington politicians. I am angry at fellow voters who only vote their only self-interest. I am angry at voters who gives their vote to the party line and particularly angry at folks who can't set aside their own bias.
Shane, you just struck a nerve and I had to respond. Nothing personal.
Dave
Rasslin isn't fake! My high school wrestling coach was also a professional wrestler, even had a Name (Don Savage - not as good as the Hulk or Mr Motto - but a name)! He lost every time - which proves it wasn't fake (we KNEW he could beat our favorites). So, we asked him if it was real: and he told it was! It was real enough to pay for his new cadillac. So There.
ReplyDeleteHey Shane. Thank you for the article. The problem I'm running into is the other option. Hillary Clinton. Could we have 2 worse options to choose from. What is a new testament Christian supposed to do?
ReplyDelete