Thursday, August 26, 2010

Is President Obama a Muslim - and Does It Matter?

Last week the Pew Research Group reported that nearly 20% of Americans believe President Obama is a Muslim. This news, combined with the president’s remarks regarding the proposed Muslim center near Ground Zero, sparked widespread discussion of the president’s religious beliefs. Is President Obama a Muslim?

This question is not merely a matter of whether President Obama’s father was a Muslim. Many people choose a different religious path from their parents, as did the president’s father, who rejected Islam for atheism. President Obama has been very clear about his convictions. "I believe Jesus died for my sins and I'm redeemed through him – that is a source of strength and sustenance on a daily basis.”

Does that sound like a Muslim to you? The Qur’an specifically denies the notion that Jesus died for our sins. "That they said, 'We killed the Christ Jesus son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah';- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them [or it appeared so unto them], and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not: Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise" (Surah 4:157). Islam teaches that Jesus was a great prophet, but it categorically denies that He died on the cross to atone for the sins of humanity.

To be a Muslim one must confess: “La ilaha il Allah, Muhammad-ur-Rasool-Allah” – “There is only one God and Muhammad is his prophet.” Whether President Obama was raised by a Muslim or not, the bottom line is that he has chosen to publicly confess allegiance to Jesus, not to Islam. Is it possible that the president is merely pretending to believe in Jesus? Of course – just as many politicians profess faith as a smokescreen for outrageous behavior. Is it true that many Muslims see the president as “one of us”? As the first president in history to have Muslim blood relatives or to have lived a substantial period of time in an Islamic country, Obama would necessarily have an appeal to Muslims. But the president claims to be a Christian, and his public statements about Jesus are incompatible with Islam. Bearing false witness about the president’s religion does not honor Christ. The bottom line is that for all of us the only thing that determines whether we are truly Christians is how our beliefs and practices measure up to the Bible.

The most disappointing thing about all of the speculation regarding the president’s religion is the assumption that something would be wrong if he was a Muslim. But what if tomorrow the president announced that he has changed his mind, confessed the Shahada, and embraced Islam openly? Would he suddenly become disqualified to be president? Not according to the Constitution, which specifically says in Article 6 that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” So why does it even matter of President Obama is a Muslim or not?

It is inescapable that the real issue here is prejudice, a deep distrust of anyone who might remotely be considered a Muslim. Why is it that during the 2008 presidential campaign many pundits loved to point out that Obama’s middle name was Hussein? “Oh, I’m just calling him by his full name,” they would demur. Really? Then why didn’t the same pundits refer to John McCain as John Sydney McCain? The only reason critics brought attention to Obama’s middle name is because it is a popular Muslim name, and in their mind, anything Muslim is suspect.

Are there Muslims who should not be trusted? Of course, just as there are some Methodists that shouldn’t be trusted. Is there a fringe of Islam that murders innocent women and children to advance its agenda? Tragically that is the case – and most often around the world the victims are Muslims. But none of this represents the vast majority of Muslims who live in America. There were many Muslims murdered by the terrorists in the attacks on 9/11. There are thousands of Muslims serving in our armed forces. There are hundreds of thousands of Muslims living in our country because they want to enjoy the American dream. Do we need to be vigilant to protect ourselves against radicalized Islam? Of course. But to dismiss anyone who is a Muslim as a threat to America is bigotry.

So what if President Obama was a Muslim? Based on the hysterical speculation I hear from some people, you would think President Obama is on the verge of imposing Sharia law on America! Not only is this absurd since he is not a Muslim, but since we live in a system filled with checks and balances, what do you think would happen to any president who tried to impose a narrow religious order on America? That president would be immediately impeached and removed from office. Duh!!!!!!

There are legitimate reasons to oppose President Obama’s policies. But the measuring stick ought to be the Constitution, not baseless speculation. Since the demographic group most likely to believe the president is a Muslim is my own group (white, Protestant conservatives), I would like to speak directly to “my people.” If we truly believe that Jesus is the only way to God, then we have the duty to share the gospel with Muslims. How can we possibly reach out to people while at the same time we push them away with fear and prejudice?

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Inez Scott (September 2, 1915 - May 20, 2010)


My Granny passed away last Thursday night, and we had her funeral yesterday. I am posting the eulogy I gave for her here. I hope to resume normal blogging next week.


I would like to start today with a reading from the Book of Acts.

Now there was in Joppa a disciple named Tabitha, which, translated, means Dorcas [in Greek that means “gazelle”]. She was full of good works and acts of charity. In those days she became ill and died, and when they had washed her, they laid her in an upper room. Since Lydda was near Joppa, the disciples, hearing that Peter was there, sent two men to him, urging him, "Please come to us without delay." So Peter rose and went with them. And when he arrived, they took him to the upper room. All the widows stood beside him weeping and showing tunics and other garments that Dorcas made while she was with them. (Acts 9:36-39).

This was one of my Granny’s favorite stories in the Bible, probably because she could relate to Tabitha as a lifelong seamstress. She did a lot of sewing for people all her life. Even after she had lost the ability to walk, if I came home and needed something hemmed she would grab her walker, hobble over to her sewing machine and go to work.

But Granny wasn’t just a seamstress; she was herself the very thread that held the fabric of our family together. And though there were plenty of reasons that fabric could have frayed and fallen apart, her unbelievable resilience didn’t let that happen. Because of Granny we can look around today see - not clothes that she made - but something much more beautiful – we can see a family that she raised. Each of us is part of the patchwork that Granny knitted together with skill and love.

Some of you here today have only known Granny as a shut-in. You didn’t know her when she was a little girl who could knock the tar out of a baseball (at least, that’s what she told me!). Or as a blushing bride, who married just a few days after her 16th birthday. Or as the student of Scripture who filled notebooks with detailed notes during Bible class.

Instead, many of you have only known her since she became confined to her house. In the last 18 years I can only think of two times she left the house (until she went to the nursing home) – when Pop died in ‘92, and when my Mom died ten years ago. For years her world consisted of three rooms - a bedroom, kitchen and living room.

Within those three rooms her life followed a modest regimen. She would wake up and head to the bathroom, where she would usually make the first of her many phone calls for the day. Then she would go to the kitchen and wait for breakfast to be made by whoever was helping to take care of her that week. It always included an egg and sausage or bacon, a biscuit, a glass of milk, and plenty of Country Crock Spread, which she often ate directly out of the tub (to my chagrin!). Once breakfast was done she would sit at the table for a long time and listen to gospel music, especially to recordings of Pop singing with his gospel quartet. Eventually she would head to the living room, and enjoy the rest of the day talking on the phone, working puzzles, watching TV, having company. When she was ready to head to bed, she expected you to set out her big blue cup filled with ice so that she would have cold water to drink in the morning, her medicine, and a couple of wintergreen mints.

Sounds like a pretty simple life. And it was. But Granny enjoyed every single day of it! She was the most content person I have ever known in my life. And because of her attitude she did not let the four walls of 40 French Ave define her existence, or her inability to get around very well to confine the scope of her influence.

Granny was irrepressible because she loved people. She loved her friends from church, and while she may not have attended for several years, she knew more about what was going on in the congregation than just about anybody else! She took special interest in the preachers who worked with the church here, and encouraged them in their ministry. Paul Johnson, John Smith, Allan Shepherd, and Robert Speer spent lots of time coming to see her and pray with her, which was a genuine delight for her. She loved her neighbors, and they loved her. I am so thankful that through the years people like the Bushes, the Pucketts, Mr. Deaton, and most of all, June and Carl Banks lived on our street. She loved you all and was so grateful for all of the many kind favors you did for her.

Usually we think of shut-ins receiving cards and calls, but there is no telling how many cards and notes Granny sent to people over the time she was shut-in. And I wouldn’t begin to try to estimate how many hours she spent on the phone. Rather than fret over what she couldn’t do, Granny embraced what she could do to encourage and care for other people. When she couldn’t walk on her own, she learned to use a walker. When she couldn’t do that, this lady in her 90s who had never driven a day in her life learned to use a scooter (and was much better at driving it than any of us who tried it out!).

A couple of years ago she decided that she needed to talk to one of her nephews about becoming a Christian, and she did. She was very careful to preface what she said by making sure everyone knew she didn’t believe in women preachers (!), but then she proceeded to admonish him to obey the gospel. And you know what – he did, something that thrilled Granny. Granny did more good from her living room rocking chair or scooter than most people do all their lives.

And of course, Granny loved her family. Six children, fourteen grandchildren, thirty great grandchildren, and over twenty great-great-grandchildren! As she often joked, “What a mess me and Homer made!” What always amazed me about Granny was her detailed knowledge of all of us. She could tell you what was going on in everyone’s life, down to all the great-great-grandkids. I could never keep all the names straight, but as the matriarch of our family she delighted in us.

She rejoiced at our successes. She anguished with our mistakes. She mingled her tears with ours. She had an inexhaustible supply of love for us. And not only us. If anyone of us had a sweetheart or friend we brought to meet her, Granny instantly became their Granny as well.

The last time I had a meaningful conversation with her was at the end of January. I went up to see her and fortunately caught her on a day when her mind was bright and she had the energy for a visit. We talked for a long time, and during that conversation we had an exchange that captured the essence of my Granny.

You have to understand that Granny went through a lot. She lost a little girl, Bessie Yvonne, who was only a year-and-a-half old, a heartbreaking time for Granny, and a wound that stayed with her all her life. She had to raise her kids during a period when Pop was not always the husband he should have been (and I don’t mean any disrespect to his memory – he would be the first to tell you he made mistakes that Granny had to make up for). She scrubbed so many floors to make ends meet for the family that she had calluses the size of quarters on her knees, and I’m sure that is one reason she had such a hard time getting around later in life. She raised her own kids in trying circumstances, then Granny helped to raise two of her grandchildren. She lost her husband, and a few years later another daughter. She had a hard life.

So, when we visited back in January, I had to ask her, “Granny, how did you ever make it through all the tough things you had to go through in life?” She looked at me with a quizzical expression on her face and said, “What tough things?” That is the essence of my Granny. As far as she was concerned, her life wasn’t tough. She just did what she had to do, what any wife, mother, grandmother, sister, friend, would do.

There is only one source of that kind of contentment. Granny loved the Lord. And the words of her favorite hymn explain how she coped with life:

"Looking to Thee for all I need, Finding in Thee a friend indeed, All of the burdens of the day meekly I bear; Neither the foe nor storm I fear, Savior divine, for Thou art near, Ready my cares and troubles all freely to share."

The key to contentment is Christ, as the apostle Paul made clear when he wrote the Philippians to thank them for a gift they sent to him when he was in prison:

But I rejoiced in the Lord greatly that now at last your care for me has flourished again; though you surely did care, but you lacked opportunity. Not that I speak in regard to need, for I have learned in whatever state I am, to be content: I know how to be abased, and I know how to abound. Everywhere and in all things I have learned both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need. I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. (Philippians 4:10-13).

And of course, the other thing that helped Granny deal with the ups and downs of life was her incredible sense of humor. Granny was one of the funniest people I have ever known. She was incredibly quick-witted, and she had the timing of a professional comedian. One night was I was home I offered to do the dishes, and by the time I was done my shirt was soaking wet. When I came back into the living room she said, “Your belly is wet. You should have put on one of my aprons…it would have covered half of you.”

And she loved to be teased as much as she loved to dish out a zinger. Another time while I was home she was reading the obituary, and saw where an older lady she knew had donated her body to science. She said, “What in the world did she think people would want to use her body for.” So I said, “Granny when you die I am going to donate your body to science to find out how it is that after all your other joints wore out your jaw just kept on going!” She loved that – and would often tell it on herself.

That’s what I will always remember Granny for – contentment in Christ, and the ability to laugh at life and herself. That is how she could reflect on 94 years of challenges and say, “What tough things?” And that is a legacy I would encourage all of us to share.

Before I finish my remarks, I want to say something to my aunts and uncle. I have never known of a family that went to the lengths that you did to be caregivers for Granny so she could stay at home. Aunt Georgia came and helped with Granny until her son’s illness required her full attention. Uncle John drove up from Tennessee and for many years spent a third of his life taking care of his mom. Aunt Avanell served as the primary caregiver after my Mom died, coming up to take care of Granny each week during the week, then going home to work and make a living on the weekends, and did this until she ended up in the hospital needing open-heart surgery. And since Aunt Sue was the youngest and lived here in town, here in the last couple of years the burden increasingly fell to her. The Bible says we are to honor our father and mother, and the honor that you showed Granny was remarkable, and I am so proud to be your nephew.

So today, in the words of the apostle Paul, we are “sorrowful, yet always rejoicing” (2 Cor. 6:10). We are sorrowful because we will miss the lady who has been the thread that held our family together, but we have so much for which to rejoice. We rejoice that she lived a long life filled with friendships. We rejoice that she not only endured hardships, she triumphed over them in Christ. We rejoice that she could be taken care of by her own family, and that when her needs became too great for that she was able to adjust so well to extended care somewhere else. And we rejoice that when she slipped from this life she did so in grace and peace, bathed in prayer and love.

I would like to conclude by reading the rest of the story of the lady called Tabitha or Dorcas.

So Peter rose and went with them. And when he arrived, they took him to the upper room. All the widows stood beside him weeping and showing tunics and other garments that Dorcas made while she was with them. But Peter put them all outside, and knelt down and prayed; and turning to the body he said, "Tabitha, arise." And she opened her eyes, and when she saw Peter she sat up. And he gave her his hand and raised her up. Then calling the saints and widows, he presented her alive. And it became known throughout all Joppa, and many believed in the Lord. (Acts 9:39-42)

The great hope we have is that Granny’s story will end like Tabitha’s. Some day the Lord Himself will say, “Inez, arise.” He will giver her His hand, and she will open her eyes and see Jesus.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Daily Bible Reading - May 20 - A Covenant with My Chosen One

First of all it is great to be back blogging thru the Bible! My quartet had a wonderful trip to Finland, but it is good to be back in the swing of things here at home.

Today's OT reading comes from 2 Samuel 9-10; 1 Chronicles 18-19; and Psalm 89. I am a little curious as to why my friend Mark put Psalm 89 with these chapters from 2 Samuel rather than yesterday's reading (2 Sam. 7-8), because Psalm 89 is a reflection on a doxology for God's covenant with David, which is given in 2 Samuel 7.

As you may recall, David wanted to build a house of worship for the Lord to replace the tabernacle. God declined this request, but offered instead to build a "house" (dynasty) for David. God promised that David's offspring would always be on the throne, that He would have a Father/son relationship with his offspring, and that David's offspring would build the house of the Lord (2 Samuel 7:12-16).

Psalm 89 celebrates this great covenant, and calls upon all creation to praise God for His covenant with David, the chosen one (Ps. 89:3-5). In verse 27 the psalmist takes the voice of God and declares:
"And I will make him the firstborn,
the highest of the kings of the earth."

David was not the literal firstborn in his family - in fact, he was the youngest son of Jesse. But God selected him to become the firstborn, referring not to chronological order but to rank. As the parallelism in the next line explains, to be the "firstborn" is to be "the highest of the kings of the earth."

Of course David's actual offspring often fell far short of the ideal set forth in this psalm. Solomon did in deed built the temple, but he later strayed from the faith of his father due to the influence of his pagan wives. And while some of the kings of David's line were great men of integrity (Hezekiah and Josiah), most of them were deeply flawed. The end of Psalm 89 (verses 38-52) probably reflects one of the periods of exile for Judah, as the people lamented their sins and God's punishment.

Only the great David's greater Son, Jesus, could truly fulfill the ideal of what the firstborn king of all the earth could be. He built a greater house - the church; reigns on a greater throne - the right hand of God; and endures forever as God's Chose One.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Blog Hiatus - Gone to Finland!

Just wanted to let you know that I will be out of the country for a few days, and will not be blogging for a while. I will be singing at the Vaasa Choir Festival with my quartet, Lunch Break. See ya in a few days, Lord willing!

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Daily Bible Reading - May 5 - When Brothers Have to Part Ways

Yesterday’s reading featured the friendship of David and Jonathan. Today’s NT reading (Acts 15) describes the parting of ways of two brothers in the Lord, Paul and Barnabas. It was Barnabas who vouched for Paul when he first came to Jerusalem after his conversion (Acts 9:26-27). Later, it was Barnabas who went to find Paul in Tarsus and brought him to Antioch to help minister the word to the first Gentile-dominant church (Acts 11:25-26). And it was Barnabas who shared the load of work on the first missionary journey, facing danger (Acts 13:50) and controversy (Acts 15:2) side by side with Paul.

As close as these two men were in the work of the gospel, we learn from Acts 15:36-41 that these two determined servants had to part company over a disagreement. The issue was not any kind of doctrinal matter. It was a matter of judgment over whether to include John Mark on the forthcoming second journey. Barnabas wanted to bring him; Paul did not. From Paul’s point of view, this young man had proven unreliable when he quit while on the first journey (Acts 13:13). This was serious, dangerous work, no place for an immature and irresponsible boy.

But Barnabas wanted to take John Mark. This is not at all surprising, since Barnabas’ very name means “son of encouragement” (Acts 4:36). Further, John Mark may have been related to Barnabas (see Col. 4:10), adding an additional reason for Barnabas to want to give him a second chance.

This difference of opinion was deep – Luke says it was a “sharp disagreement” (15:39). Eventually, Paul and Barnabas had to part company, Barnabas taking John Mark, and Paul taking a new comrade from Jerusalem named Silas.

Who was right – Barnabas or Paul? I think a good case could be made for either man. Surely Paul was right in thinking that John Mark needed to realize this work was too important to be approached half-heartedly. And Barnabas was also right in thinking that everyone deserves a second chance (and who benefited more from Barnabas’ gracious spirit than Paul?). Maybe John Mark needed both sides of love, soft and hard, to become the man he had the potential to be in the Lord.

And he did indeed become a faithful servant. In Col. 4:10, Paul makes a special point of asking the Colossians to “welcome” John Mark. And at the end of his life, Paul requested that Timothy bring Mark to him in prison, “for he is very useful to me in ministry” (2 Tim. 4:11).

I think the best part of this whole story is the way Paul and Barnabas moved past their disagreement to work for the Lord. Many times when brethren disagree the work of the gospel comes to a screeching halt. Not so here. In fact, the preaching of the word doubled, with two teams of workers rather than just one traveling to proclaim Jesus.

It is unavoidable that brothers will disagree. But if the end result can be what it was in the case of John Mark – spiritual development; and if the outcome can be what it was in the case of the gospel – more preaching rather than less, then God will be glorified.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Daily Bible Reading - May 4 - Knit Together Soul to Soul

The friendship between David and Jonathan is one of the great friendships in all of literature. I don't mean that David and Jonathan were fictional characters like Sam and Frodo, or Holmes and Watson. But I do mean that in the annals of all writing, whether fiction or non-fiction, the story of these two souls knit together in friendship (1 Sam. 18:1) is truly exemplary.

This friendship was tested by the hatred Jonathan's father had for David. In 1 Samuel 19, Jonathan reasoned with his father, convincing him that David was a hero, not a traitor. Saul agreed - but in one of his characteristic moments of weakness and vacillation, he quickly turned against David once more.

This makes the story in 1 Samuel 20 even more tragic, and poignant. David asks Jonathan why his father seeks to kill him, and Jonathan can't believe this is the case (v. 1-2). It would be hard to accept the fact that your own father is a paranoid maniac, especially when you think you have changed his mind. But as the story in 1 Samuel 2o goes on to explain, Saul did indeed want to murder David - and when Jonathan spoke up for David, Saul tried to kill him! (1 Sam. 20:33). Jonathan got the point (hardee-har-har).

What I love most about Jonathan is his humility. No one stood to lose more by David's kingship than Jonathan. He was the heir to the throne, his father's natural successor (a fact Saul angrily reminded him of in 1 Sam. 20:31). But Jonathan remained ever loyal to David, willing to serve by his side because he knew it was God's will for David to be king (1 Sam. 23:17).

Jonathan was a true friend. He remained loyal to David even at the expense of his father's resentment, and even at the cost of his own status. And despite Saul's failings, he remained loyal to his father, dying at his father's side in battle (1 Sam. 31). We would all be blessed to have a friend in our life with the integrity, courage, and loyalty of Jonathan.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Daily Bible Reading - May 3 - The Book of Acts (of Two of the Apostles)

One of my favorite college professors used to introduce his class on the Book of Acts by saying: "The Book of Acts is not all the acts of all the apostles; or all the acts of some of the apostles; or some of the acts of all the apostles; it is some of the acts of some of the apostles."

That is exactly right. And in particular, it is some of the acts of two of the apostles: Peter and Paul. In fact, an easy way to organize the Book of Acts is in two main sections, Acts 1-12 - the acts of Peter; and Acts 13-28 - the acts of Paul. At the end of Acts 12, Peter disappeared from Jerusalem after his escape from prison (Acts 12:17), and other than his speech at the Jerusalem conference in Acts 15, he is not mentioned again in the book. From Acts 13 to the end of the book, Paul is the focus of the story.

As you read the second half of the book, look for parallels between Peter's ministry and Paul's. For example, in today's reading in Acts 13, we have the first record of one of Paul's sermons, which naturally parallels the narrative of Peter's sermon in Acts 2. Each sermon has its unique characteristics, but both end up at the same spot - the death and resurrection of Jesus. In Acts 14, Paul will heal a lame man, just as Peter healed a lame man in Acts 3. And so on.

One important dimension to this similarity between Peter's preaching and miracles and Paul's is that it gave legitimacy to what Paul was doing in the minds of some of the more traditional Jews. This acceptance was not automatic for Paul, any more than it was for Peter when he went to preach to Gentiles and eat with them in Acts 10. But, if they accepted Peter's work, since Paul's work was quite similar, then they had to accept Paul.

So be on the lookout the rest of Acts for parallels with Peter, and of course, also bear in mind that both apostles share in the same kinds of experiences as did their Master.